Thursday, December 28, 2006
Partial credit is for being partially right, not for being consistently wrong
This is exactly why I'm not going to give extra credit to wingnuts for being consistent in their baseless ideologies. So you think it should be equally illegal to allow victims of rape to seek abortion as anyone else? Congratulations - you're completely wrong instead of just partially wrong like the people who only want to allow abortion in instances of rape. Dawn here consistently refuses to understand that her Biblically-inspired interpretation of human sexuality isn't a cure-all for life's woes, even when the interpretation fails for herself. That's not commendable - it's idiotic. When all the empirical evidence says the Bible is wrong, it's time to start questioning the Bible - or at least your interpretation of it - and not the evidence.